Skip to content

This would in fact not an issue with it construction; Sir John de Keith d

This would in fact not an issue with it construction; Sir John de Keith d

Re: ? Comyn wife of Malise

Concerning the Comyn child who was simply wife from Malise out of Strathearn, I had theorized when you look at the 2005 that she were Margaret, identified as partner from Sir John de- Keith (look for copy out-of blog post less than) who was 2ndly age are provided in that blog post: the new wife Emma I suggest are of some other loved ones, and not mommy of your next Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl from Buchan_ , says partly, ‘Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn, had a partner Emma, when you look at the 1261-1267, whose surname is not familiar ‘[SP II:256, cites Cal. regarding Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. a little while ahead of 1270, so their widow (Margaret) could have been “available” a little while shortly after Emma.

This was however a speculation; it can feel the advantageous asset of working with a well-known relationships ranging from Muriel Keith and you can Reginald le Cheyne. Anymore related files would naturally feel welcome.

The account in the Scots Peerage about the family of Keith claims from Sir John de- Keith (d. california. 1270) that he was thought to possess partnered Comyn, earl out-of Buchan . It personality, of your undecided (“thought to was basically”) assortment, may now become corrected in line with the pursuing the dispensation, dated on Fondi towards the fourteen The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 To your bishop off Moray. Faculty so you can distribute Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you can Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, out internationalwomen.net Imp-kГ¤lla of Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, regarding obstacle in order to matrimony as a result of the next and you may last quantities of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the near future 2nd spouse regarding Robert Stewart, initial Duke out-of Albany (d. 1420), try contracted so you can get married Reginald le Cheyne, son regarding Sir Reginald ce Cheyne because of the his wife (while the their basic husband), Helen of Strathearn. If you are you will find famous gaps about origins regarding Muriel Keith, she and you may Reginald le Cheyne would express an ancestry regarding the Comyns. not, it is too faraway to require good dispensation in the event the Muriel was a good-great-high grandd Comyn, Earl from Buchan (d. 1233), that will function as case if ‘s child.

2. Reginald le Cheyne is an effective-grandson from Marjory Comyn, child of Alexander Comyn, Earl of Buchan (d. 1290), child off William Comyn in the above list. Their particular young buck is Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn out-of 1312 to his demise into the 1328 , and you may daddy away from Reginald.

ca. 1270), try same as Marjory Comyn, and married 2ndly so you can Malise, Earl of Strathearn (d. 1312). This would mean the brand new parentage a€?believed to has been’ regarding Margaret, wife regarding Sir John de Keith, are off you to generation: she’d not have started this new d Comyn, Earl out of Buchan, but rather out-of his child Alexander. There is no research that Earl Malise and you may Marjory Comyn was in fact married far prior to 1275: just like the Lindsay composed,

You will find one to discernable base on which the relationship ranging from Reginald le Cheyne and Muriel Keith would have resided: if Margaret Comyn, wife out of Sir John de Keith (d

‘ The latest spouse in the earl, about 1275, try named Marjory, even as we understand the attesting clause regarding No. curriculum vitae., and is stated by the Wyntoun, Guide VIII. man. vi., to own come the next cousin from John Comyn, Earl out of Buchan, just who negotiated on the part of Earl Malise the wedding settlement significantly more than stated [dated in the London area, April 26, 1293 getting his daughter Matilda and you will Robert de Tony, child regarding Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de- Quincy E away from Buchan We __________________I________________ I III step one) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith I (als I E out-of Strathearn . 1270 We Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I I I I We We Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de- Keith Age off = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony We ______I_______________________ I We We We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- Age out-of Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 I le Cheyne We I I = 2) Sir David I V We I de Graham Sir William de I I__________ Keith We We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We I We III We I I We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke of Albany)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *